Stephen Vladeck Headshot
Report a problem with this profile
[email protected]

Stephen Vladeck          

Professor of Law; Author; Legal Consultant; Speaks on National Security & Counterterrorism

Stephen I. Vladeck holds the Charles Alan Wright Chair in Federal Courts at the University of Texas School of Law and is a nationally recognized expert on the federal courts, constitutional law, national security law, and military justice. Vladeck has argued over a dozen cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, the Texas Supreme Court, and various lower federal civilian and military courts; has testified before numerous congressional committees and Executive Branch agencies and commissions; has served as an expert witness both in U.S. state and federal courts and in foreign tribunals; and has received numerous awards for his influential and widely cited legal scholarship, his prolific popular writing, his teaching, and his service to the legal profession.

Vladeck is the co-host, together with Professor Bobby Chesney, of the popular and award-winning “National Security Law Podcast.” He is CNN’s lead Supreme Court analyst and a co-author of Aspen Publishers’ leading national security law and counterterrorism law casebooks. He is an executive editor of the Just Security blog and a senior editor of the Lawfare blog. And he is currently writing a book on the rise of the Supreme Court's "shadow docket," to be published by Basic Books in May 2023.

Speech Topics


The Guantánamo Paradox: The Law, Policy, and Politics of Military Detention

The National Security Constitution: How the Founding Charter Strengthens America By Dividing Power

How the Supreme Court Became So Influential: A Brief History

Why We Should Care About the Supreme Court’s “Shadow Docket”

News


Why the government's slow move to appeal the mask decision may be a legal strategy
Law professor Stephen Vladeck at the University of Texas has a theory for why the Justice Department may be taking its time. "If the government's goal was to actually have the mandate be in effect, we would have seen it move faster," he says. "We would expect it to be seeking emergency relief by asking Judge Mizelle to stay her ruling and then – when she says no – by asking the Federal Court of Appeals in Atlanta to freeze her ruling pending the government's appeal."
The Supreme Court leaks are transparent political plays

Related Speakers View all


More like Stephen